Editorial by Rosa Whitaker: Living Together: Separate but Unequal

We share this editorial authored by our CEO, Rosa Whitaker, which was published on April 1st on Newsweek online. The Whitaker Group joins others calling for Africa’s debt relief in this season. Praying that the world will unite in defeating this virus and that no one or region will be left behind

Sooner or later, we will defeat COVID-19. Immunity will develop among those, the vast majority, who survive it. Testing will reduce the need for wholesale self-isolation. Safe and effective treatments will be developed along with a vaccine. The virus, now running amok, will find the world less and less hospitable to its reproductive needs.

How many lives it will have taken or damaged in the interim is unknowable at this point. The losses, human and economic, look to be staggering: possibly millions of lives, certainly trillions of dollars. One of the many variables that will determine the final bill is how the pandemic plays out here in Africa—as well as other settings with dense urban populations, frail public health systems, inadequate infrastructure, widespread poverty and spotty governance.

If you need to wash your hands many times a day, it helps to have a tap close by and lots of soap. How do you self-isolate when you’re sharing a shack with half a dozen or more family members representing multiple generations? To feed that family you have to go to work. How do you stay six feet from your fellow passengers in the packed minibus or from the driver of the boda-boda motorcycle that may be your only means of getting there?

It has been said that when the industrialized north catches a cold, Africa catches pneumonia. But what happens when it’s the north that catches a highly infectious form of pneumonia, not only figuratively but quite literally, and gives it to Africa? We are about to find out.

No one can say we did not see this coming. In a TED talk he gave during the 2014-16 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, Bill Gates said: “If anything is going to kill 10 million people in the next decade it is likely to be a virus, not a war, not missiles but microbes.” While we had invested billions in nuclear deterrence, the Microsoft founder continued, “we have invested very little in a system to stop an epidemic.”

History is replete with prophets unheard and policymakers doggedly preparing for the last war rather than the one that is actually about to hit them. The novel coronavirus simply marched round our collective Maginot lines.

Coming after SARS and MERS and H1N1, Ebola, by far the most horrifying in its efficiency as a killing machine, should have been the wake-up call Gates wanted it to be. But, thanks to the extraordinary skill, resourcefulness and courage of local health workers and Medecins Sans Frontieres, it was largely contained away from urban areas and before it could cross oceans. Of the 11 patients treated for Ebola in the US during that outbreak, just one died. On the ground in Africa the death toll was 11310, terrible but not enough to shift our priorities decisively.

So now we are in the thick of a world war we should have seen coming but didn’t. Is it going to end like World War I with a deeply flawed and non-inclusive Treaty of Versailles that does little more than guarantee another war, as Keynes warned at the time? Or will we try to build something lasting on the ashes—as statesmen did at the end of World War II, when they established a robust and wholly new global architecture around institutions like the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, and when America launched the Marshall Plan?